|
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006
New vetting and barring scheme - automatic barring for
specified offences
The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 brings in a new
scheme for vetting and barring individuals who work with children
and vulnerable adults. This is due to come into operation in the
autumn of 2008 and a key feature will be an automatic bar if a
specified offence has been committed. The list of these offences
has been long awaited.
In mid-November the Government published the results of the
consultation held over the offences to be included in this list.
There was widespread agreement with its proposed list, so while we
await a statutory instrument giving the list the force of law, we
know the offences it will contain.
There will be one list of offences that will bar people from
working with children and another list covering work with
vulnerable adults. The most serious offences on each list will lead
to an automatic bar with no opportunity to make representations.
The lesser offences will lead to an automatic bar with a right to
make representations to the Independent Safeguarding Authority
(ISA). While guidance on these representations is awaited, we
expect that if the individual's conduct since the commission of the
offence shows the offence to be an aberration, and that the
individual does not pose an unreasonable risk to the welfare of
children or vulnerable adults, the bar will be lifted.
The two lists of offences are long and can be accessed
using the link below.
List of offences.
Two key points are worth emphasising:
- An individual will be barred for a caution, as well as a
conviction. This may result in some rough justice, with people who
had accepted a caution when they would have defended a charge at
trial finding themselves treated as if they were convicted.
- No allowance will be made for the age of the offender, or the
amount of time that has passed since the commission of the
offence.
Devising the list is a very difficult task. Whilst the inclusion
of the most serious offences is not problematic, the inclusion of
offences at the margins will always be controversial and appear
somewhat arbitrary.
The offences that result in an automatic bar with no right of
representation are all sexual, with the act being either committed
against a child or vulnerable adult, or in the presence of a child
or a vulnerable adult. As would be expected, serious offences such
as rape are included. However, the inclusion of some other offences
may cause more controversy. For example, Section 7 of the Sexual
Offences Act is included. This makes it an offence for someone to
assault sexually a child under 13. This covers all types of sexual
contact, including kissing or touching. This assault can be
committed by a child over 13, and even though the sexual contact
may have been consensual between the two children, in law the child
under 13 cannot consent. Therefore it would appear that should a 13
year old touch a 12 year old sexually, even though this was
consensual, this would prevent that individual from ever working
with children or vulnerable adults.
The offences for which there is a right of representation are
more varied. These include serious offences of violence, some
additional sexual offences and other offences involving
prostitution and pornography. The list also includes ill treatment
or wilful neglect under Section 44 of the Mental Capacity Act
2005.
In any vetting and barring scheme, the issues at stake are of
the greatest importance. There needs to be a proper balance between
the need to protect children and vulnerable adults and the rights
(particularly Human Rights) of individuals working with them.
Whether this balance is correctly struck under the new scheme will
depend largely on how the ISA operates, and the Government is
currently consulting on that.
However, for people who have a conviction for an
offence where there is no right to make representations, the future
would appear to be clear.
For more information please contact
Chris or Giles.
The content of this bulletin is provided for
the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only
brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not
provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute
legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.