Download your free guide now
Download your free guide now

Rachel Willams, Solicitor

Rachel Willams, Solicitor

t: 0115 976 6538

f: 0115 947 5246

rwilliams@brownejacobson.com

 

 

Sharon Jones, Partner

Sharon Jones, Partner
t: 0115 976 6284
f: 0115 947 5246
sjones@brownejacobson.com

|

Procuring LIFT projects under the NHS Estatecode

The NHS Estatecode

 

The newly revised “Estatecode” recently published by the Department of Health provides NHS organisations with best practice guidance on all aspects of managing their estate, including acquisitions and disposals of owned or leased land and property. Designed to be an up-to-date “user manual” for all those involved in estates and facilities management in the NHS, part of the Estatecode aims to provide a brief overview of the formal procurement requirements for NHS organisations in relation to the ownership of land and property.

 

There are many different types of procurement initiatives being undertaken by NHS organisations and the Estatecode acts as a signpost for organisations to seek further guidance and advice where necessary. One of the NHS procurement initiatives is “LIFT” (Local Improvement Finance Trust) and this article aims to throw some more light on this initiative and on the procurement rules that govern it.

 

How does LIFT work?

 

NHS LIFT is a Government-Led procurement programme for the delivery of community-based health and social care facilities. It is delivered through a public/private partnership whereby a core property development company (Liftco) acquires and develops land and property and leases them to NHS organisations on a fully-serviced basis under a “lease-plus” arrangement.

 

It begins with local NHS organisations getting together to develop a Strategic Service Development Plan which considers a joint strategy for delivering an improved service for patients.

 

It is then necessary to search for a partner with whom to set up the Liftco. A private sector partner is identified through a competitive procurement, and then a long term partnering agreement is established through the Liftco to deliver investment and services in local care facilities. This company is owned partly by the private sector and partly by the public sector participants. The company acquires and develops land and property and leases them to NHS organisations on a fully-serviced basis under a “lease-plus” arrangement. It will deliver the Strategic Service Development Plan and it will also enter in to a 20 or 25 year undertaking to deliver the partnering services.

 

What procurement rules and procedures apply to LIFT projects?

 

All NHS organisations involved in the procurement of LIFT projects are subject to the European Union procurement rules i.e. EC Directive 2004/18/EC and the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (“Regulations”). These Regulations apply to all LIFT projects that involve procuring contracts for works, goods or services. The Regulations specify certain financial thresholds (“Thresholds”) which regulate the manner in which a procurement is carried out. Most LIFT contracts will surpass these Thresholds and consequently the NHS organisation will be subject to the full rigour of the Regulations. For contracts that fall below these Thresholds, the EU Treaty principles of equality of opportunity and treatment, transparency, proportionality will still apply.  

 

For those which exceed the Thresholds, the Competitive Dialogue procedure, introduced January 2006, is likely to be the standard procedure to be used in the procurement process. Competitive Dialogue has replaced the “Negotiated” procedure which is now only to be used in truly exceptional circumstances.

 

Overview of Competitive Dialogue procedure

 

The entire Competitive Dialogue process is likely to last between 18 months and two years and it is imperative that a detailed plan of timescales and resources is prepared prior to initiating the procedure. To briefly summarise the process (where the project exceeds the Thresholds):

 

The NHS organisation publishes a Contract Notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU Notice). All potential contractors then have 37 days in which to request to participate in the tender.

 

Following receipt of the requests to participate the NHS organisation will issue a Descriptive Document and a Pre-qualification Questionnaire to each candidate who has responded to the OJEU Notice. A bidding conference may also be held to provide further information to potential bidders and to clarify any outstanding issues.  A pre-qualification evaluation is then conducted using pre-prepared tests and criteria to produce a pre-qualification report (unsuccessful candidates should be offered the opportunity for a debriefing). This process will sift the number of tenderers.

 

The formal Competitive Dialogue Process then opens by sending bidders an Invitation to Participate and an Invitation to Submit Outline Solutions. This leads on to further dialogue with relevant bidders on their proposed solutions to arrive at short-list of bidders to enter into further dialogue on Detailed Solutions (usually three or four bidders).

 

Following the issuing of the Invitation to Submit Detailed Solutions to the

short-listed bidders, the bidders enter into constructive dialogue with the Organisation to negotiate and discuss their emerging solutions for delivering the project. Bid submissions are then finalised.

 

It does not end there though as the organisation may then de-select certain bidders, enter into further dialogue, formally seek refined solutions or close the dialogue and seek a final tender from all bidders. Finally, it will evaluate bids, select the preferred bidder and achieve Financial Close.

 

Need for efficiency

 

There is widespread concern that this Competitive Dialogue may result in higher bid costs for both the public and private sectors. It is a lengthy process.  Contractors may be involved in the process for a significant period and still not win the contract and  NHS organisations may have to pay compensation to unsuccessful tenderers. The process may become even more protracted if an unsuccessful bidder or any other dissatisfied party decides to mount a challenge to the appointment of the preferred bidder within the mandatory ten day standstill period allowed once the contract has been awarded.

 

It is therefore important to consider at an early stage, and in detail, how the dialogue stage will be conducted and inform prospective bidders of this. In this regard, NHS organisations should always seek legal advice to guide them through the entire procurement process and to alert them to the potential pitfalls that await them.

 

For more information or advice, please contact Rachel Williams or Sharon Jones.